Monday, September 17, 2012

From my Facebook Status--thought you'd find this interesting:
 
It's International Book Week. The rules: Grab the closest book to you, turn to page 54, post the 5th sentence as your status. Don't mention the title. Copy the rules as part of your status.

I got this from my cousin Kate . All I had was my Kindle, but this is from the book I was reading (in honor of taking the train across NY and down the Hudson). This is from location #540. (#54 only yielded par...
t of the author's intro)

"'You forget that I have told you our guide is now a Mohawk, and that he serves with our forces as a friend.'"

I don't like the rule about not telling. I will reveal it later, unless someone guesses/knows whence the quote came.

Leslie Blaha and others in the Google Blog, Never Without a Book, would love this.

Monday, September 10, 2012

I've been reading a lot about women physicians and the first WAACs in the military. Strictly G.I.: The WWII Letters of Cpl. Wanda M. Renn was about one of the first women who were accepted in the Army as WAACs (later WACs) during WWII. They were supposed to be temporary became permanent towards the end of the War.

One of the most interesting things was the opposition that many had to having women officially in the military. During previous wars, women had been nurses only--in a kind of special group. So, when Congress passed a bill allowing this, there was a lot of controversy. People spread rumors about the women: They were promiscuous, having sex with soldiers, officers, etc. Or, they were lesbians and doing God-knows-what in the barracks.

Interestingly enough, however, the Army did not grant these women official status, at first (WAACs), but eventually they became WACs which meant they were more on equal standing with the men.

I enjoyed reading the letters. A granddaughter published her grandmother's letters from the time she was in the Army. The young woman served in England, North Africa and France. She was in communications and attached to SHAEF (supreme headquarters allied expeditionary force) and was not in danger (actually was shelled once, though) for the most part. Wanda wasn't a great writer, but she showed her daily life with interesting detail.

Strictly G.I.: The WWII Letters of Cpl. Wanda M. Renn

'Mary Edwards Walker: Above and Beyond' was the story of the first woman to work with the U.S.Army officially as a contract surgeon. This was, to my surprise, during the Civil War.

Mary Edwards Walker: Above and Beyond Dr. Edwards attended a holistic medical school (which made it fairly progressive at the time) not too long after Elizabeth Blackwell became an MD. She was quite a character and very unusual. Edwards was a suffragist but managed to antagonize the leadership of the movement by her insistence on wearing pants. She designed her own outfits and very, very rarely wore the traditional hoop skirts and corset. She felt they were unhealthy (the former for trailing in the dirt & picking up filth and the latter, well, that's obvious. You can't breathe in them!). During the Civil War, she refused to help out as a mere nurse and after much wrangling and effort became, officially, a contract assistant surgeon (a general term for doctors in the military--she didn't do any amputating) in a military hospital (Note: contract surgeons are civilian doctors who work for the military. Many, if not most, of the doctors during the Civil War were contract surgeons). She managed to get herself captured by the Confederates as a spy (quite probably was, working with Sherman) and was held as a prisoner of war. 'Endeared' herself to various officials of both armies by nagging them into improving conditions in every place where she worked.

At one point, because of her service, she was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor, the first woman to receive it. Later on, when combat soldiers questioned its being awarded too frivously (all the soldiers of one unit received one), the Army took it away. She refused to give it up and wore it until she died. It was restored later in the 1970s.

There was one other woman who was a doctor during the Civil War, but she managed to do it by disguising herself as a man.

The book goes on to detail the rest of her life--she was very cantankerous. During WWI, she was active in recruiting and training nurses. I have to say, I admire her greatly, but I am not sure that I would have liked her.

Women Doctors in War (Williams-Ford Texas A&M University Military History Series)'Women Doctors in War' was truly fascinating. I learned a lot from this book. One of my characters is a woman doctor during WWII, and I have had a problem with some of the writers in my group objecting to her being a doctor--they maintain there weren't any.

There were women doctors serving as contract surgeons in the Spanish American War and during WWI! Some went overseas with surgical teams. It seems that at the turn of the century, women doctors (American medical schools had quotas--5% of a class could be female) tended to go into OB-GYN and pediatrics (obviously). Less obviously, women found less opposition in the areas of anesthesia and 'neuropsychiatry.' I guess they were considered more nurturing fields. The latter really expanded with the 'Shellshocked' casualties of the war. Women doctors were often more successful with these broken soldiers than their male peers--soldiers apparently were able to open up to a woman more comfortably than to a man. It's a male ego thing. This seems to be true even to present day military.

WWI didn't have field hospitals, so medical personnel were rarely in direct danger from the enemy. There were several women who ended up in Europe as physicians. Contract surgeons, however, were still civilians and did not receive army rank, pay, or benefits.

The book goes into great detail about each woman--education, personal life, etc.--although there isn't much known about some of them. The book is very dry--it feels a little like a doctoral thesis--lots of research, carefully supported conclusions, and not much speculation about feelings and the like. The reader has to stop and imagine what the lives of these women felt like.

During the SAW and The Great War, medical schools, hospitals, etc., were more open to admitting women. It looked good for women who wanted to be doctors. After 1918, however, the schools, residencies, etc., closed back up. It became very difficult for women again--there wasn't a shortage of doctors without a war.

In WWII, the Army drafted doctors as well as young men. This meant that there was a shortage of doctors in general. Schools, residencies and other training programs blossomed. Male medical school students were given free education and condensed training in order to get them into the military sooner. Women students were not offered such benefits. However, the military took women on as contract surgeons (again). The formation of the WAACs however, meant that the Army needed women doctors--primarily to take care of the new women in the service and Army dependents.

Many women volunteered. It is fascinating to read of their backgrounds. There is not a lot of discussion about individual incidents of discrimination or harrassment, but there is general discussion of these problems. The women doctors at first were no really in the army (WAACs) but later were commissioned. They generally received a lower rank than an equally qualified man. They were often assigned to paper work/administrative tasks or routine exams. Or ended up at an Army post in the U.S. taking care of WACs or dependents. In Europe, they served in hospitals, again performing the usual things. The women had to fight, sometimes, to get an assignment in keeping with their training--a plastic surgeon, for example, spent much of her service doing routine exams. Even psychiatrists found themselves looking after women soldiers.

Many found ways to lobby themselves into better, more meaningful, more appropriate assignments, but it usually took some real effort.

The book traced careers of women physicians up until present times. After WWII, most were summarily let go, The pevailing attitude was that women belonged in the home. However, it was only a few years later that the Korean War broke out. Again, women were able to get into places they couldn't during peace time.

In the mid50s and 60s, again, there was the back last and quota system. But with more women doctors in the military (all branches), there was expanded opportunity. However, they never had the opportunities of equivalent males.

However, the end of the draft made a huge difference. For one thing, the military needed doctors, plain and simple. While social attitudes can be medieval, the institutions are very practical. They established incentive programs for qualified students--get a free medical education, serve in the military for a few years and then you're free and clear. They did not specify the gender required for applicants when establishing these programs. The book goes into a lot of detail on how many things have changed for women.

Anyway, I found the book very enlightening. The author explains that there are still social obstacles to overcome (one woman stationed overseas, for example, was shut out socially by all the male officers, and she outranked the nurses. She had no one to hang out with, as it were. The military does have a strict caste system). Some women doctors were hassled by angry (jealous?) nurses. Others were helped and nurtured by them. But as more and more women are in the military and at higher ranks, they will mentor and bring along the young women and help them ascend even higher (military culture is that at a certain rank, higher officers do this with younger ones--help them build a resume as it were).

However, I wouldn't recommend it unless you are very interested in women doctors and the military.

These weren't fun reads, but I learned an awful lot, and was very glad of August's assignment as it steered me to these books. I liked the last one the best.

les

Sunday, September 2, 2012

Sacajawea


Native Americans fascinated me when I was a kid.  I did multiple middle school projects on Sioux Indians and Crazy Horse was my hero. As is usually the case, I had a pretty romanticized view of Indian life and mostly envisioned it as a cross between "Dances With Wolves" and "Dr. Quinn, Medicine Woman."  Of course, real life is never that neat and Anna Lee Waldo does a really excellent job intertwining the harshness of living off the earth with the spirituality of Native American culture in her biography about Sacajawea.  On the other hand, her writing style drove me nuts and I sort of just wanted to Wikipedia Sacajawea instead of finishing the 1300 page book.  She was trying to weave historical authenticity into her language use, but it was just hard to get through. 

It's an exhaustive study and I am sort of mind-blown by the amount of research Waldo must have had to do to write the book.  Plus there's very few primary sources from the early 1800s and what's available is pretty hard to decipher.  (Waldo includes some original transcripts of diary entries from Lewis and Clark and it's barely intelligible.)  The most interesting thing about the story is that what we all know about Sacajawea leading Lewis and Clark across the Louisiana Purchase to the Pacific Ocean all happened in her mid-teens and that part of the story is wrapped up in the first third of the book.  The rest of the book is the other 60+ years of her life and her interactions with the white man, her role as a matriarch,  and her life on a reservation.

Julie/Julia


Julia Child would have celebrated her 100th birthday August 15th.  She was an amazing inspiration to millions of people (probably mostly women), even though I mostly remember her funny voice on TV.  :)  I learned the most about her reading Julie/Julia, actually since I am not much of a cook and stay far away from recipes containing more than ten ingredients.  :)  The book was OK and ditto for the movie. 


The book read very much like "Eat, Pray, Love" in that the authors are writing about themselves and they really can't help but get fairly sanctimonious about their journey in personal discovery, which I think contradicts the purpose of self discovery.  I do commend Julie Powell's dedication in not only completing her mission, but also in maintaining her blog at the same time.  Having now started a few blogs, it's hard to keep up!  And as I said earlier, there's no way I would have gotten through most of those recipes. 

The movie was enjoyable, but mostly because Meryl Streep killed as Julia Child!  If you like cooking and you like Julia Child, I would recommend both, otherwise, I would just recommend the movie.  :)


Thursday, August 2, 2012

August Book Club

I can't believe it's the last month of the summer!  Our theme for this month is in honor of Sally Ride, who I met a few years ago at a workshop hosted by NASA.  She was incredibly inspirational and there are so many other women out there who have done the impossible and stimulated a whole new way of viewing the world.  So read a book about female pioneers and get inspired!


Sunday, July 15, 2012

Ender's Shadow



I wrote about Ender's Game in an earlier blog because it won two sci-fi literary awards.  Ender's Shadow takes place at the same time as Ender's Game, but from the perspective of one of the other children in Battle School - Bean.  Besides the difficulties in writing essentially the same story from a totally different viewpoint, Ender's Shadow focuses more on the political ramifications of war and the aftermath that would result from defeating the alien species.  Ender's Game and Ender's story itself continues on to describe how Ender deals with his role in the destruction of the Buggers on a psychological and emotional level.  Ender's Shadow and Bean's story continues with how Bean uses his super-intelligence to influence the world's politics and establish Earth as one political force instead of multiple individual nations.

On a sci-fi level, Ender's Shadow delves into two main topics: faster than light speed communication (via something they call the ansible) and genetic engineering (specifically whether Bean is still human because he has been genetically altered to be super-intelligent).  Orson Scott Card doesn't dig into the science behind either of these ideas - they're sort of just stated as having occurred.  Card is more interested in the ethics and consequences of having this technology available.  The ansible issues are discussed more in the sequels to Ender's Game.  The sequels to Ender's Shadow deal with the physical results of Bean's genetic engineering. 

Here's how it's explained in the book:

"Savants were the key, for me.  Autistic, usually.  They have extraordinary mental powers.  Lightning-fast calculations.  Phenomenal memories.  But they are inept, even retarded in other areas.  The human brain could be far smarter than it is.  But there is a trade-off.  A terrible bargain.  To have this great intellect, you have to give up everything else.  The genome that allowed a human being to have extraordinary intelligence acted by speeding up many bodily processes.  The mind worked faster.  The child developed faster. 

The key unlocks the mind because the brain never stops growing.  But neither does anything else.  There is no adult height.  There's just height at time of death.  You can't keep growing like that forever.  There's a reason why evolution builds a stop-clock into the growth control of long-lived bodies.  You can't keep growing without some organ giving out, eventually.  Usually the heart.  The prognosis is 25 years of life."

This is what the sequels to Ender's Shadow address.  Bean is a brilliant kid who shapes the politics of the world but he has a severely limited life span because of his altered genes.  It's ironic because Bean spent the first ten years of his life super small (all his energy went to developing his brain), and then his body catches up and he ends up a giant.  But don't worry!  Bean's destiny is not an early death...there are five more books and lots of futuristic science to explore!

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

I taught this book for many years to my sophomores, and even they found it disturbingly true for our times.  Technology seems to be the dominant presence in our lives -- and what about books?  They are not being burned (well, maybe in some places), but the actual, physical book is disappearing.  This book is a MUST READ -- and remember, it was written a long time ago.  What has happened to front porches??  And what about people who just want to think?? 

Monday, July 2, 2012

July Book Club

In honor of Ray Bradbury, this month's theme will be science fiction, not to be confused with fantasy.  I personally recommend that everyone read at least one Ray Bradbury book or short story.  I've never read any of his works, and Leslie and Biz recommended a few things to me at the book club meeting, so I'm looking forward to reading one of sci-fi's most famous authors!

Sunday, July 1, 2012

Boonsboro

To cap off our romantic June theme, Megan and I went to Boonsboro, MD to see the town my favorite romantic author, Nora Roberts, practically owns.  As I mentioned in an earlier post, Roberts' newest series takes place in Boonsboro and centers around the renovation of the Inn Boonsboro that she and her husband spearheaded.

I was so excited to go see my book in real life!  The outside of the inn is beautiful.  It is, however, a not-so-friendly atmosphere.  It is locked to the public and the innkeepers apparently have a mission to keep all non-guests out of the building.  Megan and I sort of crept in to ask questions about possibly staying there and we were allowed about two feet inside the door, given a brochure, and then fairly firmly herded out.  Sigh.  Even as a major Nora Roberts fan, I don't think I want to stay there.  


The bookstore across the street is owned and operated by Nora's husband and it's an eclectic, small-town shop with an emphasis on bestsellers, local authors, and souvenir knick knacks.  They have a Nora Roberts room, of course, and I think I've read every single book in there.  :)  She is in town for book signings about once a month and I will attend one of those in the future.


Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Vision in White


This is the first book in Nora Roberts' Bride Quartet.  She does this a lot - writes separate novels for a group of friends or siblings to make a miniseries.  I wouldn't consider this her best series, but the topic is one of my favorites - wedding planning!  If I weren't a teacher and were a braver person, I'd start my own wedding planning business.  In this series, the girls were childhood friends and each grew up with a different skill set that combined to create a highly successful company.  "Vision in White" is about the photographer.  Nora Roberts is pretty predictable at this point, but I still love her!  I especially love her dialogue.  It's fast and witty and really funny sometimes.  The girls have great chemistry and the guys they eventually fall for are nicely original.  (After you've written 100+ romances, it's probably difficult coming up with completely new stories every single time.)  I won't bore you with a blog about each book in the quartet, but if you're into weddings, you should definitely read them!

Sunday, June 17, 2012

Call Me Irresistible


It took me a couple chapters to get into this book because the names of the characters are really strange...Fleur Savagar Koranda...Cornelia (Nealy) Case Jorik...they were just weird.  But the two main characters, Meg and Ted, were quite engaging.  Their personalities were a lot like the Cinderella Deal, actually.  The girl was flaky in an "I don't know what I'm doing with my life" kind of way and the guy was very well put together like Mary Poppins - "practically perfect in every way."  Some parts of the book stretched the limits of my imagination (things were just a little too contrived sometimes), but I enjoyed it and by the end of the book, literally couldn't put it down.  I was putting groceries away and reading the book at the same time!  :)

I discovered at the end of the book why all the other couples in the book (Meg's parents, Ted's parents, Ted's childhood best friend, Meg's best friend's parents) were so cutesy and happy together...it's because they were subjects of previous books by Susan Elizabeth Phillips!  So now I have to read all those.  :)  There are seven books in this series that take place in "Wynette, Texas."  The first one is "Fancy Pants," if you like reading books in order. 

Friday, June 15, 2012

Helen of Pasadena


I loved this book!  I didn't really think I would.  It's one of those books that has been sitting on my "to read soon" shelf for months.  I think it was another one of those Borders-is-closing purchases, but it fit nicely into the romance theme of the month and I had a really good time reading it!

I'm actually having a hard time describing the story, though...I've erased what I wrote at least four times!  It's funny, it's got a lot of interesting characters, including the "sidekicks," it's heartwarming, it's not completely "everyone lives happily ever after" (which usually happens in a romance), but still happy...  It's also kind of a novel take on your typical romance because it involves a middle-aged woman who has a thirteen year old son.  The challenge in the book is that Helen's cheating husband dies suddenly, leaving her and her son in financial straits, but to maintain her image in society (think Real Housewives of Orange County), no one's supposed to know about it, but everyone does.  Anyway, Helen's a really strong woman, and I highly recommend this book!

As an aside, I found a cool link to another online book club blog with an author interview from this book...looking forward to the sequel!

http://www.manicmommiesbookclub.com/2010/12/january-2011-selection-helen-of.html


Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Bookends


I bought four books by Jane Green from Borders when they were having their closing sale (moment of silence for Borders...).  Bookends was the first one I read.  Honestly, it was kind of boring.  The beginning was OK and then I needed the story to move along faster, so I skipped the middle, picked it up again about 100 pages from the end and felt like I hadn't missed much.  It's the story of a bunch of college friends who drifted apart after a fight with one of the group.  A few of them stayed in touch and they each have different relationship issues - too needy, can't commit, no spark, etc.  It's a story about how friends can help and hinder your search for love and companionship.  As a whole, it was enjoyable, but not gripping.

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

After Four Months


One of our members is an author!  Leslie writes stories based on the TV show "Combat."  I'll let her explain more, but she sent me a couple of her stories.  If you're interested, let me know and I'll e-mail you a couple.  (I tried to attach one, but apparently you can only upload pictures and videos.) 

"After Four Months" is one of her romantic stories.  It's basically the story of how one of the main characters in "Combat," Saunders, meets his wife during the war.  Even if you've never watched "Combat" (I haven't), it's still a really great story...romance, action, humor!  It's all very impressive how everything flows together, actually.  Good for you, Leslie!

Monday, June 11, 2012

The Cinderella Deal


Biz introduced me to Jennifer Crusie and this is the first of her romantic comedies that I've read.  It's a very cute story and while it's a pretty simple plot, the characters are fun and they feel like real people that you'd like to get to know.  Basically, you've got a carefree hippie girl and a straight-laced serious guy who need to pretend to be engaged (she needs money and he needs to appear old-fashioned and respectable).  It's sort of hate at first sight, which eventually becomes, what else...love!  It's got the same feel as Evanovich's books without the loony tunes bits (a la Grandma Mazur and Lula).  Great book to kick off the summer!

Sunday, June 10, 2012

Something Blue


This book is the sequel to "Something Borrowed," which I blogged about in January.  To recap, Rachel and Darcy are best friends.  Darcy is marrying Dex, but Dex and Rachel begin an affair.  Darcy, who is not the most faithful of girls, also begins an affair with Dex's friend Marcus.  Not only does she have an affair, she becomes pregnant!  Eventually everyone finds out what's going on.  "Something Borrowed" is about Rachel's side of the story.  "Something Blue" is from Darcy's perspective and continues the story from when everyone found out. 

Emily Giffin is very into discovering yourself and writing about women realizing that what they have is not necessarily what they wanted and what they wanted is not necessarily what they needed.  Her characters are very relatable and even when they drive you crazy (Rachel drove me nuts cuz she wouldn't just say what she wanted - she was really passive and Darcy drove me nuts cuz she was just so self-absorbed and oblivious), you still feel for their predicaments and want happy endings for them.

I do suggest reading "Something Borrowed" before you read "Something Blue."  "Blue" can be a stand alone book, but the backstory and character relationships are much more powerful if you read "Borrowed" first.

Friday, June 8, 2012

Couplehood


I find Paul Reiser HILARIOUS!  I loved watching "Mad About You" (sitcom from the 90s), and I've bought three of his books - Couplehood, Babyhood, and Familyhood.  I recently re-read Couplehood and laughed for about 20 minutes straight.  And I finished the book in about a half an hour.  It's an extremely fast read, but highly amusing!  As you can probably tell from the title, "Couplehood" is about the foibles of getting into relationships and then maintaining one.  The first chapter is about what I call "fitting."  Gist: if you don't "fit" the person you're with it's not going to work.  How you define "fit" is up to you, but it's physical and emotional.  I totally agree with this and there's lots of tests you do to figure out if you and the person you're with "fit."  Here's an excerpt from the book, just cuz I'm not as funny as Paul is.  :)

When I was twelve, I remember holding hands with this girl - I want to say, "Patty," but I'm guessing here - and something about the way she held hands was just...wrong.  Our fingers didn't line up right.

You know how when you grab someone's hand, the fingers sort of automatically slide into place, your thumb next to their thumb, second finger next to their second finger?  Simple, right?  Not a lot of ways to screw that up.  This girl did.

I think what she did was slide her fingers in too early so they were all out of sync with mine.  (I'm sitting here, holding hands with myself to try to explain this to you.)  Okay...here's what it is: I like my pinkie to be on the outside.  And she started one finger too soon, so her pinkie was on the outside, and my pinkie was smushed up between her third and fourth fingers. 

Now, I'm not saying she's a bad person.  But the second we held hands, I knew she wasn't for me.  We just didn't fit.

And I knew I couldn't explain it to her, either.

But I remember thinking that if you're going to be with someone, you should find someone who fits.

Not to get all sappy, but I found someone who fits!  I fit right under Chris' chin.  And our hands fit too.  (My pinkie on the inside and my arm behind his.)  It just works.  :)

Saturday, June 2, 2012

At the Altar


Besides Disney princess movies, I think my first childhood romance was Anne and Gilbert.  In addition to her series on this famous little orphan, LM Montgomery wrote hundreds of other pieces about life and love in the form of novels, short stories, and newspaper serials.  "At the Altar" is a compilation of matrimonial tales.  They're all a sweet mix of whimsy, old-fashioned morals, and amusing predicaments.  

Friday, June 1, 2012

Once In Every Life



I just love Kristin Hannah.  This is the third book by her that I've written about on the blog.  This one has an unusual premise. Tessa is killed in a bus accident at the beginning of the book.  She is offered a second chance at love by an angel and is transported into the body of a woman who died in childbirth in the pioneer west.  This woman was not a very loving person.  She felt that her husband's "cowardice" during the Civil War ruined her chance at a comfortable life as a Southern belle.  After Tessa is "reborn" into this woman's body, the family has to come to terms with the "new and improved" wife/mother.  There's a lot of initial distrust, and a surprising "based on a true story" mystery at the end.  Hannah just writes emotional stuff really well.  I get so wrapped up in the characters!

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Julie Garwood

Julie Garwood was my first introduction into adult romance books.  Mostly I was fascinated by the setting of the stories - I liked the historical ones that happened in medieval England with castles and Scottish lairds. I don't know if I liked them cuz that's what my fantasy books were like (kings and wizards and magic), or because my mom liked them and that's what she had at home.  :)  Anyway, my two favorites by Julie Garwood were "The Prize" and "The Bride."


In "The Prize," it's a Norman vs. Saxon setting.  The guy is the big bad Norman ("baron warrior," according to the back of the book) and the girl is the gentle Saxon, with a strong spirit (they're always like that).  What I liked about this one is the depth of the characters - they all had their personal motivations for the way they behaved (the interaction between the hero and the heroine's brother is great, and I like all the pages and lower ranking knights), hobbies that make them interesting (chess was a big factor in this book), and, of course, there's always a bad guy that they all hate and bond over.


"The Bride" is similar (of course), but in this case, the heroine is English and the hero is a big bad Scottish laird.  This one is more of a mystery suspense than a straight up boy meets girl story.  This sounds ridiculous, but my favorite thing about this book was the description of the characters.  Jamie (the girl) had black hair and violet eyes!  I thought it would have been the coolest thing in the world to have violet eyes.  :)  And horses played a big role in this book and I was horse crazy at the time, lol!  The ending has a really memorable scene as well - the Scottish lairds are all divided (think Braveheart) and Jamie does something for each of them throughout the story that make them all loyal to her and they protect her from being stolen by this sniveling, greedy English lord.  Woot!  :)

Monday, May 28, 2012

Unbroken interview

CBS Sunday morning did a profile on Louis Zamperini yesterday!  I was all excited cuz I actually knew what they were talking about, having read "Unbroken" at your suggestion a couple months ago.  :)  Here's a link to the video.

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7409886n

I'm actually more interested in Laura Hillenbrand's life now.  She fleshed out Zamperini's in such detail, I feel like I know the guy.  Meanwhile, her life seems to be incredibly private.

Sunday, May 27, 2012

Family Trust


Standard chick lit - I'll type out the description on the back of the book:

"Firmly planted on the Wall Street fast track to success, Becca Reinhart has no desire to marry and raise a family.  Ditto Edward Kirkland, a charming playboy who has never known what it means to work for a living - and hopes never to find out.  Enter Emily, who becomes Becca and Edward's common denominator when a quirk of fate gives them joint custody of the precocious little girl.  Suddenly, two people who have never met find themselves sharing the trials and tribulations of domestic life as they navigate the rocky shoals of parenthood, from naptime to pay dates to preschool admissions.  And amid the daily demands of raising a young child, Becca and Edward discover something else: They're made for each other."


I bought the book because it's by the same author that wrote Legally Blonde and I love that movie!  Amanda Brown is not a subtle author - she sort of slams you over the head with what the characters are feeling.  There's no room for interpretation - you don't have to think much reading this book, but it is amusing, in part because of the supporting cast of characters.  Nice, simple summer romance!

Saturday, May 26, 2012

The Rocky Road to Romance


Janet Evanovich is famous for her Stephanie Plum series, but before she started that immensely popular character, she wrote short romance novels.  But these aren't your typical Harlequin romances - she describes them as "red-hot screwball comedies."  And they really are very amusing.  It's great summer reading and the characters are pretty charming in a typical Evanovich way.  I've read all twelve that she wrote and never got bored.  Each book features a new pair of main characters, but the same quirky sidekicks show up multiple times.  Instead of Grandma Mazur, there's a shotgun-toting older woman named Elsie and each book has a dog.  The original "Bob" makes his very first appearance in this book!

Anyway, if you haven't read the the Stephanie Plum novels and think you might be interested (I haven't met anyone who doesn't like them), you might want to start with one of these and see if Evanovich's style is to your liking.  If you have read the Plum novels and need your Evanovich fix while she's writing the next one, this is a great choice!

Thursday, May 24, 2012

June Book Club


June is the most popular month for weddings and one of our members is getting married in a few weeks!  So our theme for this month is romance, weddings, marriage, and all that other relationship stuff.

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Things I Want My Daughters to Know



This book really brought home the overriding theme of our book club meeting last weekend.  Basically, the idea is that our mothers all had lives before they were our mothers and most of us don't know anything about them!  In this book, the mother of four daughters is dying of cancer and leaves a journal and letters to her children about her life as a woman, a mother, and a cancer patient.  The story itself focuses more on the daughters and their struggles with relationships and life after your mom dies.  Lots of not-so-subtle advice about communication being the cornerstone of any healthy relationship (parent-child, boy-girl, sibling-sibling). 

It's a tearful read, mostly because you spend a lot of it thinking about how you would feel if your mom died and you were in the same situation.  It would SUCK if my mom died.  I wouldn't know who to talk to about silly stuff (last week I called her to find out what kind of vegetable oil I should buy), serious stuff (luckily, not a lot of that has happened recently), secret stuff (sh!  it's a secret!)...   My mom and I have a great relationship and I wasn't too much of a brat during my teenage years (I don't think), so we kind of grew into our adult interactions pretty smoothly. 

But to go back to my original point, moms aren't just moms and I think it would be great if we all took the time to find out who our moms were before they were ours!  I have this sort of odd perspective with a lot of my friends who are now becoming mothers.  I knew them before they were moms and yet sometimes it's difficult to focus on the part of them that isn't a mom because it becomes so much of their identity.

In any case, this was a great book to read in honor of mothers - it made me REALLY APPRECIATE mine!

Saturday, May 12, 2012

Maine


If you love Maine, you'll love this book. But, in addition to the scenery, it deals with 3 generations of women -- the matriarch, her daughter and daughter-in-law, and her granddaughter. It gives realistic characterizations of these women and the dialog is spot on. Yes, the women appear guilt ridden and scheming and probably should not talk so much, but their flaws are believable, and the interactions between them are funny. There certainly are generational divides. Good read!

Friday, May 11, 2012

Winter Garden


Kristin Hannah pulls all my heartstrings!  I'm sitting in the Starbucks with a java chip frappuccino and tears running down my face as I finish this book.  I cried the first time I read a Kristin Hannah book too.  I simply devour them.  It's almost impossible for me to put them down. 

"Winter Garden" is about the relationship between a mother and her two daughters.  It's a tense relationship because the mother seems to be completely emotionally disconnected from her daughters.  It's the father that holds the family together and when he dies of a heart attack, he makes the mother promise to finish the fairy tale story she used to tell her daughters when they were children.  The mother is reticent, but after a series of personal crises in the daughters' lives, they convince her to tell the story. 

This is an amazing story of love, pain, and forgiveness.  It really stresses the impact a mother has on her children's lives and how a person's identity is defined by their parents.  It's also about making the most of every moment and not being afraid to love, even after you've lost everything.  Must read!

Tuesday, May 8, 2012

The Accidental Mother



My husband read the title and immediately guessed the plot of this book, so I guess that tells you a little about the predictability of books I read...  :)  In any case, the accidental mother here is an event planner (Sophie) for wealthy corporations and becomes the caretaker for two girls (Bella and Izzy) who lost their mother (Carrie) in a car accident.  Carrie and Sophie used to be best friends and Carrie named Sophie the guardian of her children in her will.  Since then, Carrie and Sophie have drifted apart and haven't really been in contact.  What will Sophie do?!  :)  As you can imagine, Sophie first views the two girls as rather a burden, interfering with her career goals.  Time passes, and the bond between Sophie and the girls strengthens.  A wrench is thrown into the gears when the girls' father, who had not been in the picture, is found.  I think Coleman does a good job dealing with the childrens' perspectives on losing their mother at such a young age as well as the not-so-smooth transition into a new mother-daughter relationship. 

Monday, May 7, 2012

The Secret Life of CeeCee Wilkes


I first read this book a few years ago when Corrie invited me to join one of her book club meetings.  I'd forgotten most of it except I liked it enough that it stayed in my bookcase.  :)  It was a great read the second time around too!  It's sort of hard to discuss relationships with mothers in this book without giving too much away, though.  I will say that Diane Chamberlain is really into writing about secrets mothers keep to protect their children. Basically, there are three major mother-daughter relationships that influence the characters in the book and a couple peripheral ones dealing with the siblings of the main characters.

CeeCee Wilkes lost her mother to breast cancer when she was twelve and her mother left her with a series of letters that she was supposed to open throughout her life.  (Totally cool idea, by the way.)  Genevieve Russell is kidnapped and has her baby while being held captive.  Genevieve dies in childbirth and the fate of the baby is a major part of the story.  (There's some interesting nature vs. nurture here.)  CeeCee becomes a mother at the tender age of 16 and is petrified that something will happen to her daughter, Corinne, who grows up with a series of phobias because of her mother's overprotective behaviors.  (Corinne is actually the first character you meet in the story, even though her mother is the focus.)  Anyway, it's quite a roller coaster ride of a book - you're not sure whether you feel sorry for the characters or if they're just getting what they deserve.  Lots of secrets and betrayal throughout, but it all ends well without being too unbelievably sappy.  Hooked me from the beginning!

Thursday, May 3, 2012

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

May Book Club


Happy May Day!  May is the month for Mother's Day, so our theme for this month will be relationships with mothers. 

Saturday, April 14, 2012

The Accidental Tourist


Anne Tyler's novel was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize and won the National Book Critics Circle Award for fiction.  It was OK...but I've read other Anne Tyler novels that I thought were a lot better than this one.  Her strength is writing characters who are quirky and flawed and completely human.  No one's perfect and it's the oddities in people that she writes with such empathy.  I think I was originally put off by the disorganized way the book seemed to be written.  It's like she wrote a bunch of stuff in whatever order it occurred to her and then pasted it together.  On reflection, however, I think maybe she did it that way on purpose.  The other strange part for me was that I imagined the characters as much older than they actually were.  The way they were behaving, it made me think of them as being in their 50s, but they were really in their upper 30s.  I kept having to do mental double takes. 

The main character, Macon, is an OCD fellow who writes travel guides for people who don't like to travel.  His life is supremely structured and logical until his son is killed in a robbery related shooting.  Then his wife leaves him, he sort of goes OCD overboard, breaks his leg, and moves back in with his like-minded brothers and sister.  The twist is the unpredictable, flighty dog trainer he has to hire to prevent his dog from attacking people.  As you may guess, Macon develops a relationship with the dog trainer.  In the end, he has to make a choice to go back to his wife or stay with the new woman.

I liked the book.  It's an easy read and entertaining.  I just don't know if I would have considered it award-winning.  Ironically, there's a Q&A at the end of the book and the interviewer asks Anne Tyler what she's reading now.  She responds that she's just fallen in love with Ann Patchett's Bel Canto!  :)

Saturday, April 7, 2012

Bel Canto



Alright - time to get serious!  Bel Canto won all sorts of awards, including the Orange Prize, and PEN/Faulkner Award, and was a finalist for the National Book Critics Circle Award.  The PEN/Faulkner Award is given to the year's best fiction by living American citizens.  Ann Patchett won the award in 2002.

I think the most interesting thing about this book is that it's actually based on true events.  From Wikipedia:
The Japanese embassy hostage crisis began on 17 December 1996 in Lima, Peru, when 14 members of the Túpac Amaru Revolutionary Movement (MRTA) took hostage hundreds of high-level diplomats, government and military officials and business executives who were attending a party at the official residence of Japan's ambassador to Peru, Morihisa Aoki, in celebration of Emperor Akihito's 63rd birthday. Most of the hostages were soon released. After being held hostage for 126 days, the remaining dignitaries were freed on 22 April 1997, in a raid by Peruvian Armed Forces commandos, during which one hostage, two commandos, and all the MRTA militants died.
In the book, the South American country is unspecified, the party was held at the vice president's house in honor of a Japanese businessman, and the crisis lasted about the same amount of time.  It seems so unbelievable that someone could be a hostage in fairly civil circumstances for that amount of time, but I guess it happens!  Patchett does a great job describing the microcosmos of the terrorists and the hostages.  She gives all the characters an emotional past, present, and future that fits perfectly well within the setting of the story.  I have no idea what the details of the actual real-life terrorist crisis were, but Patchett's version rings so tragically true.  I haven't read any other PEN/Faulkner Award winners, so I don't know if this book meets expectations, but it was certainly a good read...twice!

Friday, April 6, 2012

Outlander


I've waited three months to be able to post about this book for Book Club!  Outlander, by Diana Gabaldon, won the RITA Award in 1992.  The RITA Award recognizes outstanding published romance novels and novellas.

I discovered Diana Gabaldon at the National Book Festival in DC.  The 7th book in the Outlander series had just been published and my mother-in-law's friend, Kay, was a fan.  Gabaldon was an amusing speaker and I figured, why not?  I'll give them a try.  Plus, if I like them, that was seven gigantic books to read!  And the books are BIG.  Outlander, at 850 pages, is the smallest one!

Anyway, I LOVE this series.  I love the story, I love the characters, I love the writing.  It's sort of a crazy premise, but Gabaldon is a magician.  She weaves in the magic of standing circle stones with the reality of 18th century day-to-day life in all its ickiness into a love story that is really just breathtaking.  Some of it is horrifyingly graphic.  The rape scene in Girl with a Dragon Tattoo is nothing compared to the descriptions of torture in this book.  But it's not gratuitous.  Everything makes sense.  The detail is incredible and Gabaldon's background doesn't really indicate that she would be good at writing a historical romance novel - she has degrees in zoology, ecology, and marine biology! 

Outlander is so popular, Gabaldon started a spinoff series about one of the supporting characters, Lord John Grey.  I'm starting to read those now.  Totally different feel - much more political and full of shadowy intrigue.

Thursday, March 29, 2012

The Hero and the Crown


The Hero and the Crown, by Robin McKinley, won the Newbery Medal in 1985.  This award is given to the author of the most distinguished contribution to American literature for children.  I remember the book was better the first time I read it.  Maybe this is one of those books that works for children but not as much for adults.  I can see how McKinley's style of writing would be novel (no pun intended!), but the story is bland and it's hard to tell when the story is reaching a climax or when it's just moving the plot forward.  I've read a bunch of Newbery Medal winners and The Hero and the Crown is one of the more difficult reads.  It's not really straightforward (lots of what I call "dream-writing" where the character is hallucinating or having a vision and you're not really sure what's going on) and because it's fantasy, the names, settings, and animals are all a bit unfamiliar.  I'm glad it wasn't the first fantasy book I'd ever read...I think I would have been turned off the genre.

Ender's Game


 Ender's Game is the winner of the Nebula Award (1985) and the Hugo Award (1986) for best science fiction novel.  It's one of the few Nebula and Hugo Award winners I've actually read, which is a little surprising given the number of sci-fi books I've read in my life.  :)  (The others were Dune, Speaker of the Dead, and HP and the Goblet of Fire.)  Ender's Game truly stands the test of time and my personal test of re-readability.

Given my recent obsession with Hunger Games, I was drawing all sorts of parallels between the use of children in war in both these novels.  Orson Scott Card is superb at writing insights into the psychological struggle of protagonists.  This becomes even more important in the various sequels and concurrent novels connected to Ender's story.  Some of the books are entirely about ethics and emotion while others focus on politics or science in a future world.  I admit both the politics and science were sometimes way over my head.  I still don't really understand what an ansible does (something about bridging the space/time continuum and faster than light speed communication) or what a hegemony is (something about a political alliance?).

But there's all sorts of great moments throughout the entire series where you stop and think about what life would be like if what is described were really possible or actually happened (laws on number of children that a family can have, designer babies, maturity vs. age, consequences of destroying an entire alien species, colonization or other planets, etc).  The interesting discussions that can stem from this book and its relatability to young adults is probably why it's one of the books on the English curriculum reading list.

Sunday, March 25, 2012

April Book Club

You're a winner!  Now that we've all survived March, it's time to celebrate!  This month's theme:

Award Winning Books

I checked out bookspot.com and they had a list of major book awards.  There are lots more, especially in specific book genres, but I figure this will get us started, especially since I'm not real familiar with any of these yet.

Booker Prize
Caldecott Medal
National Book Award
National Book Critics Circle Award
Newbery Medal
Nobel Prize for Literature
PEN/Faulkner Award
Pulitzer Prize
Commonwealth Writers' Prize

Saturday, March 24, 2012

Bronte Books

So I got sucked into TCM last night and watched Wuthering Heights (1939) and Jane Eyre (1943) because I recognized almost all the actors from Errol Flynn movies.  :)  But this is the sort of situation where I would be motivated to read a book based on having watched the movie.  I had absolutely no interest in reading either of these books (they seemed all Charles Dickens-y depressing), but now I think I could get into Jane Eyre.  Wuthering Heights is too tragic for me to want to read it and I wasn't real sympathetic to Cathy - she's the one who messed everything up anyway.   

I wiki'd both books, of course, and found out that the Jane Eyre movie skipped a section of the book, but it still ended the same, so I won't be too surprised reading it.  As I was googling stuff, I found an interesting article entitled, "Jane Eyre movie adaptations: Why are there so many and which one is the best?"

http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/culturebox/2011/03/up_in_the_eyre.html

On a literary note, I'm glad I finally know who Heathcliff and Rochester are.  They're alluded to a lot in random places and I never really understood the reference until now!

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Delta Girls


This book actually has nothing to do with our theme for the month, but I just finished reading it and discovered something really cool!  It's called "abecedarian poetry."  Basically, you write a poem where the first letter of every word uses the letters of the alphabet in order. 

This is one from the book:

Apple brownbetty cures depression.
Eat fruit generously; hunger is just
kindling, lurking minutes north
of pleasure.  Quit rationing;
start tasting unlimited varieties,
wanting x-tasy, yumminess, zest.

As you can see, you sort of cheat with "X."  I wrote one for this book - it doesn't quite make sense until you read the book, I think, but it was fun!  I'm going to try to use "abcde poetry" in a lesson for my students.  :)

A book concerning Delta events for girls harvesting in June.
Karen likes macho Nathan.
Organic pears quite ready!
Skate Tristan.
Underwater Vieira whales X-cite young zealots.

Monday, March 12, 2012

Longshot



This is a book by Dick Francis, one of my favorite mystery authors.  I first started reading him because I was a horse-crazy girl, and his stories take place around the British horse racing world, but I continue to read them because he writes dialogue in the coolest way.  Sometimes his characters hardly speak, but they imply a lot with sardonic looks and dry wit.

Anyway, this particular book is about a man who writes books on survival - he calls them "travel guides," but they're to places that bring on the man vs. nature challenge.  He's hired to write a sort of biography on a racehorse trainer and stumbles upon a secret that could get him killed.  He's forced to call upon his survival skills to get through and solve the case, although to a rather surprising end.

Today's topic:  dehydration

The first rule of survival is to get water. According to survivaltopics.com, a person, under ideal conditions, could survive about 10 days without water.  Of course, if you don't have water, you're probably not in ideal conditions.  The average survival time without any water is about five days.  Getting water was paramount in both Hunger Games arenas and harvesting rain enabled Louie and Phil to survive on their raft, even before they figured out how to fish.

My personal dehydration story: On my first camping trip to Glacier National Park, we were hiking up to Granite Park Chalet, advertised as an easy 4 mile hike up the mountain.  It was a spur of the moment kind of thing and we didn't have our water bottles filled.  I figured it was no big deal cuz I had done 8 mile hikes without drinking much of the water we brought.  Plus there was a promise of apple pie once we got up to the chalet.  False advertising!  It was 4 miles from the bottom of the mountain to the top, but the trail was a series of switchbacks, with probably tripled the total walking distance.  I got thirsty about a third of the way up.  I drank the water condensing at the bottom of my plastic bag of carrots.  By the time we made it to the top, I was pretty desperate.  There was lots of whining.  Here's the fun part.  We left our wallets in the car so we couldn't pay for any food or water!  That's when I started crying.  :(  Anyway, a very nice girl filled our water bottles for free and we made it back down, but I was so exhausted from the dehydration, I couldn't even walk a mile the next day before my body made me stop.  It took me about a day and a half to recover.

Sunday, March 11, 2012

Unbroken



I just flew through this book, no pun intended!  Read the whole thing in two days, most of it in one sitting.  I couldn't believe it was only 1943 and a third of the way into the book when he crashed and became a POW.  Two years until the end of the war!  An eternity of torture, especially since he didn't know when the end was coming.  Laura Hillenbrand is an amazing storyteller.  How she can take millions of disparate facts and wrap them into a coherent and gripping story is beyond me.  She had world history, small town lifestyle, personal anecdotes, and cultural anthropology looping around each other practically seamlessly.

As far as a survival story, you can't beat real life for emotional awe.  As much as I got wrapped up in the Hunger Games, it's still fiction and your brain can sort of step away from the story and file it in a place that says, at least these people suffering through this aren't real.  But with Unbroken, it was all real.  I fully admit that I am a wimp, for myself as well as for others.  I have practically no pain tolerance at all and suffering of others pulls at my heartstrings pretty hard.  Meanwhile, I do have a pretty vengeful streak flying through my soul, and I was all for "an eye for an eye" type justice for the Bird.

So today's survival topic: what gets you through an ordeal like this?

For Phil, it was probably thoughts of his fiancee.  For Louie, an inner sense of strength and rebellion?  In Hunger Games, Katniss made a promise to Prim and in Catching Fire, it was all about keeping Peeta alive.  Is it hope?  stubbornness?  anger?  faith?

Monday, March 5, 2012

Law and Order and HeLa Cells


There's a Law and Order episode based on HeLa cells!  I've included a link to another blog that describes the episode and its connection to the HeLa story. 

http://allthingslawandorder.blogspot.com/2010/05/law-order-immortal-recap-review.html

Quite fascinating, the way the show writers adapted the true story.  (It's Season 20, Episode 21, "Immortal," if anyone's interested in watching it.)  The connections are obvious if you've read the book.  My husband was really interested in the legal aspects of the Lacks' situation and others that Skloot describes.

Sunday, March 4, 2012

Catching Fire



I reread Hunger Games and Catching Fire this weekend.  Hunger Games is still a fantastic book.  It was just as fascinating the second time around, and made me even more excited to see the movie!  I think they did a great job with casting and we'll see how it all plays out int he movie adaptation.  I read the book thinking about survival as a theme this time around, which I think I'll use as a springboard for some discussion about all the books we read this month.

Topic:  altruism vs. self-preservation

Which one is more necessary for survival?  In Hunger Games, the gladiator-style arena would imply a "survival of the fittest" kind of battle, but it turns out that alliances and working together turns out to be more beneficial in the end.  Hunger Games is good at following Katniss' thought processes as she goes through the transition from "everybody out for themselves" to a feeling of emotionally-motivated cooperation. 

In Catching Fire, the sequel to Hunger Games, the altruistic motivation is really a main focus of the games.  It's sort of twisted into a manipulation by political forces, but again, in the end, she survives.  Without giving too much away for those who haven't read it yet, the subject of her altruism is not so lucky.

Is this topic present in the books you have read about survival?